By: Swarnim Shrivastava 

In today's interconnected world, the relationship between social justice and trade has become increasingly significant. Far from being solely a human rights issue, social justice plays a crucial role in shaping economic outcomes and trade dynamics. This article explores the intricate connection between social justice and trade, highlighting its importance in both organized and unorganized sectors.

Social injustice in the workplace, particularly gender-based discrimination and safety concerns, can significantly hamper economic growth and trade. A 2023 World Bank report estimates that gender inequality costs the global economy approximately $160 trillion in lost earnings potential. This staggering figure underscores the economic imperative of addressing social justice issues.

In the organized sector, companies that fail to ensure a safe and equitable work environment often face decreased productivity, higher turnover rates, and reputational damage that can affect trade relationships. For instance, a major tech company in Silicon Valley reported a 15% drop in stock value following widespread allegations of gender discrimination and harassment in 2022.

Safety Measures: An Investment, Not a Burden

Progressive companies are realizing that ensuring employee safety, particularly for women, should not be viewed as a burden but as a crucial investment. Providing secure commute services, hiring female conductors, and installing CCTV cameras are steps that contribute to a safer work environment. These measures not only protect employees but also enhance the company's reputation and productivity.

A 2024 survey by the International Labor Organization (ILO) found that companies implementing comprehensive safety measures for women employees saw a 22% increase in productivity and a 30% reduction in absenteeism.

The landmark case of Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan (1997) in India set a precedent for workplace safety, particularly for women. This case led to the formulation of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, commonly known as the POSH Act. These legal frameworks underscore the importance of creating safe work environments and hold companies accountable for employee well-being.

Discrimination based on gender or any other factor is not only against constitutional principles but also morally reprehensible. Companies that go beyond mere legal compliance to create truly inclusive environments often see significant benefits. A 2023 McKinsey study revealed that companies in the top quartile for gender diversity on executive teams were 25% more likely to have above-average profitability than companies in the fourth quartile.

While professionalism is crucial, corporations should not lose sight of the human element in their pursuit of efficiency. A balance between professional conduct and empathetic management can lead to higher employee morale and productivity. As Ratan Tata, former Chairman of Tata Sons, once said, "Businesses need to go beyond the interest of their companies to the communities they serve." A recent Gallup poll found that employees who feel their company cares about their wellbeing are 69% less likely to actively search for a new job.

As we navigate the complex interplay between social justice and trade, it's clear that addressing these issues is not just a moral imperative but an economic necessity. Companies, policymakers, and individuals must work together to create workplaces that are safe, equitable, and conducive to both personal and economic growth. By doing so, we can build a more just society and a more robust global economy.

In this evolving landscape, the message is clear: social justice and economic prosperity are not mutually exclusive but mutually reinforcing. As we move forward, embracing this reality will be key to sustainable growth and equitable trade relationships in the global marketplace

In an era of globalization, the interplay between social justice and trade has become increasingly significant, shaping not only human rights but also economic landscapes worldwide. Recent studies and events have highlighted how social injustice, particularly in the unorganized sector, can severely hamper trade and economic growth, creating a ripple effect that touches every aspect of society.

The unorganized sector, as defined by The Unorganized Workers' Social Security Act, 2008 in India, comprises workers engaged in enterprises employing less than ten people. This sector, which includes home-based workers, self-employed individuals, and daily wage laborers, forms the backbone of many developing economies. However, the lack of social security and fair labor practices in this sector has far-reaching consequences beyond just human rights concerns.

Key provisions of The Unorganized Workers' Social Security Act, 2008 include the establishment of social security boards at national and state levels, registration of unorganized workers, and the provision of social security benefits such as life and disability cover, health and maternity benefits, and old age protection. Despite these provisions, implementation remains a challenge, affecting millions of workers and, consequently, the broader economy.

The impact of social injustice on trade is multifaceted. For instance, in the textile industry, which relies heavily on unorganized labor, reports of exploitative practices have led to international boycotts and trade restrictions. In 2023, several major clothing brands faced backlash and import bans due to allegations of using forced labor in their supply chains, resulting in significant economic losses and disrupted trade relations.

Moreover, the lack of social security in the unorganized sector leads to lower productivity and higher turnover rates, directly affecting the quality and quantity of goods produced for both domestic consumption and export. This instability in the workforce translates to unreliable supply chains, making it difficult for countries to maintain consistent trade relationships and meet international demand.

The Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, plays a crucial role in addressing one of the most egregious forms of social injustice that impacts trade. Bonded labor, a practice where individuals are forced to work to pay off debts, often under exploitative conditions, not only violates human rights but also distorts labor markets and undermines fair competition in trade.

This Act, which prohibits all forms of bonded labor, is instrumental in showcasing the importance of social justice in economic activities. By criminalizing bonded labor and providing for the economic rehabilitation of freed bonded laborers, the Act aims to create a more equitable labor market. This, in turn, promotes fair competition, enhances productivity, and improves the quality of goods and services produced, thereby positively impacting trade.

The implementation of the Bonded Labour Prevention Act has led to notable improvements in sectors like agriculture, brick kilns, and mining, which have historically been prone to bonded labor practices. For example, in the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, efforts to eradicate bonded labor in brick kilns have resulted in improved working conditions, fair wages, and consequently, better quality products that meet international standards, boosting the state's export potential.

However, challenges remain. The International Labour Organization estimates that millions of people worldwide still work under conditions of modern slavery, including bonded labor. This not only represents a grave social injustice but also creates unfair competition in global markets, undermining legitimate businesses and distorting international trade patterns.

The nexus between social justice and trade is further exemplified in international trade agreements. Many modern trade pacts now include labor provisions that require signatories to uphold certain labor standards and social protections. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), for instance, includes groundbreaking labor provisions aimed at protecting workers' rights and promoting fair competition.

As we move forward, it is clear that addressing social justice issues, particularly in the unorganized sector, is not just a moral imperative but an economic necessity. Countries that fail to ensure fair labor practices and social security for all workers risk facing trade barriers, economic sanctions, and reduced competitiveness in the global market.

The unorganized sector, which constitutes more than 90% of total employment in India, plays a pivotal role in the country's economy. As of 2011-12, out of 47 crore total employed, about 39 crore were in the unorganized sector. However, this sector often faces exploitation and lacks proper social security measures, hampering both social justice and economic progress.

The importance of addressing social justice issues in the unorganized sector cannot be overstated. Workers in this sector, including those in industries such as beedi rolling, construction, and contract labor, often face poor working conditions, low wages, and lack of social security benefits. These factors not only violate basic human rights but also impede productivity and economic growth. For instance, the beedi industry, which employs millions of workers, predominantly women, has been plagued by issues of child labor, health hazards, and unfair wages. This not only affects the workers' well-being but also impacts the industry's competitiveness in the global market.

To address these issues, the Indian government has enacted several laws aimed at protecting workers in the unorganized sector. The Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966, is one such legislation. This Act provides for the welfare of workers in beedi and cigar establishments and regulates the conditions of their work. Key provisions include the prohibition of child labor, provision of health and welfare measures, and regulation of working hours. The implementation of this Act has led to improvements in working conditions and has helped in reducing exploitation in the industry.

Another significant piece of legislation is The Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996. This Act aims to regulate the employment and conditions of service of building and other construction workers and to provide for their safety, health, and welfare measures. It mandates the registration of establishments employing construction workers and provides for the constitution of welfare boards to address the needs of these workers. The Act has been instrumental in providing a legal framework for the protection of construction workers, who form a significant portion of the unorganized workforce.

The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, is another crucial legislation that addresses the issues faced by contract workers. This Act regulates the employment of contract labor in certain establishments and provides for its abolition in certain circumstances. It mandates the registration of establishments employing contract labor and licensing of contractors. The Act has been significant in providing some level of job security and better working conditions for contract workers.

Despite the existence of these laws, there is a significant lack of awareness among the vulnerable groups for whom these acts have been enacted. Many workers in the unorganized sector are unaware of their legal rights and the provisions that exist for their protection. This lack of awareness often leads to continued exploitation and denial of basic rights. For instance, in the case of Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India (1984), the Supreme Court highlighted the plight of bonded laborers in the stone quarries of Faridabad, emphasizing the need for effective implementation of labor laws and awareness among workers.

The tribal population, which forms a significant part of the unorganized sector workforce, faces unique challenges. Many tribals are employed in forest-based industries, mining, and agriculture, where they often face exploitation due to lack of formal contracts, low wages, and hazardous working conditions. The case of Niyamgiri in Odisha, where the Dongria Kondh tribe successfully resisted bauxite mining on their sacred hills, highlights the complex interplay between tribal rights, environmental concerns, and industrial development.

Garment Industry in Bangladesh, following the Rana Plaza collapse in 2013, which killed over 1,100 workers, global brands faced intense pressure to improve working conditions in their supply chains. This led to the Bangladesh Accord on Fire and Building Safety, demonstrating how social justice concerns can drive changes in international trade practices. Coffee Industry in Latin America: Fair Trade certification has helped address social injustices in the coffee industry, ensuring better prices and working conditions for small-scale farmers. This has not only improved lives but also enhanced the quality and sustainability of coffee production, positively impacting trade. Electronics Manufacturing in China: Reports of poor working conditions in electronics factories have led to increased scrutiny and demands for reform from international buyers, illustrating how social justice issues can influence global supply chains and trade relationships.

Recognizing the need for comprehensive social security measures for the unorganized sector, the government established The National Social Security Board. This board recommends and monitors social security schemes for unorganized workers. It has been instrumental in implementing schemes such as the Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Maan-dhan (PM-SYM) for old age protection and the Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (PMJJBY) for life insurance coverage.

In conclusion, the nexus between social justice and trade is undeniable. As India strives for economic growth, it must ensure that this growth is inclusive and respects the dignity and rights of all workers, both in the organized and unorganized sectors. Only then can we achieve true progress that benefits all sections of society.

Author: Swarnim Shrivastava

A 2nd year B.A. LL.B student at National Law University, Tripura.