Senior Congress leader and Indian Overseas Congress chief Sam Pitroda has issued a clarification after triggering a political row with his statement that he felt “at home” in neighbouring countries, including Pakistan.

Pitroda said his comment was only intended to emphasize the "shared history and people-to-people bond in the Indian subcontinent," and not to overlook the "pain, conflict, or grave challenges" posed by terrorism and geopolitical tensions.

“My intention has always been to call attention to the realities we face: concerns about the electoral process, the importance of civil society and youth, and India's role—both in its neighborhood and globally,” he posted on X.

“If my words have caused confusion or hurt, I want to clarify that my aim was never to belittle anyone's suffering or undermine legitimate concerns—but to foster honest conversation, empathy, and a more grounded and responsible approach to how India sees itself—and is seen—by others,” his statement read.

In an interview with news agency IANS, Pitroda had stressed the importance of prioritising India’s neighbourhood in foreign policy, saying, “I’ve been to Pakistan, and I must tell you, I felt at home. I’ve been to Bangladesh, I’ve been to Nepal, and I feel at home. I don’t feel like I’m in a foreign country.”

His inclusion of Pakistan in the remark handed the BJP an opportunity to attack the Congress.

“Rahul Gandhi’s blue-eyed boy and Congress Overseas chief Sam Pitroda says he ‘felt at home’ in Pakistan. No wonder UPA took no tough action against Pak even after 26/11. Pakistan’s favourite, Congress’s chosen!” BJP spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari posted.

Pitroda has often courted controversy with his comments.

Last year, he briefly stepped down from his post after two remarks, one on diversity, which the BJP alleged had racial undertones, and another on inheritance tax, sparked political backlash.

Ahead of the Lok Sabha polls, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had also referred to his statements, alleging that if Congress came to power, it would redistribute people’s wealth to “infiltrators” and “won’t even spare the mangalsutras of women.”