Iran says it fired missile at USS Abraham Lincoln after 'enter range and we fire' warning

However, there has been no immediate confirmation or response from US officials regarding the alleged incident.

Iranian Army public relations stated that coastal cruise missiles were launched in the direction of the aircraft carrier, escalating tensions in an already volatile regional environment.

Warning preceded alleged strike

The development followed a warning from the Iranian Navy, which said the US carrier was under constant surveillance and could be targeted if it moved within range of Iran’s missile systems.

According to Iranian state broadcaster Press TV, Navy Commander Rear Admiral Shahram Irani cautioned that the vessel would be struck if it entered operational range.

He emphasised that Iranian forces were closely monitoring the carrier’s movements.

Strong rhetoric from Iranian military

Senior Iranian military officials reinforced the warning with sharp statements dismissing US strategic influence.

Lieutenant Colonel Ebrahim Zolfaqari, spokesperson for the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, claimed that what was once described as American “strategic power” had now turned into a “strategic defeat”.

His remarks came amid heightened tensions and followed recent developments involving Donald Trump, who had earlier issued a 48-hour ultimatum threatening strikes on Iranian power infrastructure.

Contradictions over diplomatic engagement

The situation has been further complicated by conflicting claims over diplomatic engagement.

Trump recently stated that Washington and Tehran had held “very good and constructive” discussions aimed at resolving hostilities.

However, Iranian officials have denied any such communication.

Press TV cited sources in Tehran asserting that no official talks had taken place between the two sides.

Zolfaqari echoed this stance, declaring that reliance on US assurances was no longer viable.

Escalation follows brief de-escalation signals

The alleged missile launch comes shortly after indications of a temporary de-escalation, when Trump paused potential military strikes following what he described as productive exchanges.

Iran, however, framed the shift differently, suggesting it resulted from its warnings of retaliatory action against regional energy infrastructure.

Regional stability and strategic messaging

Iranian officials maintained that regional stability now depends on their military capabilities.

Zolfaqari described the situation as one of “stability through power”, asserting that there would be no return to previous conditions unless threats of military action against Iran were entirely withdrawn.

He also criticised what he described as internal divisions within the US administration, questioning the coherence of Washington’s approach.